Having suffered through a 0-for-Western-Conference sweep in my first -- and rather poor -- upset-heavy attempt at this NHL playoff's picks, I feel obligated to take a realistic approach to the conference semifinals.
Eastern Conference
Boston Bruins (1) vs. Carolina Hurricanes (4)
Bruins in six games
Washington Capitals (2) vs. Pittsburgh Penguins (3)
Penguins in seven games
Western Conference
Detroit Red Wings (1) vs. Anaheim Ducks (4)
Ducks in seven games
Vancouver Canucks (2) vs Chicago Blackhawks (3)
Blackhawks in six games
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Revisiting my picks
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I respectfully disagree my friend.
Here is Moody's rendition of the outcome.
Eastern Conference
Boston Bruins (1) vs. Carolina Hurricanes (4)
Canes in six games
Washington Capitals (2) vs. Pittsburgh Penguins (3)
Penguins in seven games
Western Conference
Detroit Red Wings (1) vs. Anaheim Ducks (4)
Wings in 6 games
Vancouver Canucks (2) vs Chicago Blackhawks (3)
Blackhawks in six games
The Bruins-Hurricanes was a tough call. We like and have ties to both teams. I believe Boston has a bit more scoring depth.
As for the Wings, I don't want them even get a chance to repeat. Anaheim is much better equipped than Columbus to challenge Detroit.
I wonder what others think? C'mon, folks, join in.
I agree with the Bruins have more scoring Depth but went with the Canes edging them on heart.
I can never doubt my hometown Wings, so I have to admit bias on that one.
Post a Comment